Skip to main content
· 7/24/2002

Ryidu v. Lancaster

Citations

  • 41 F. App'x 665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “to the extent that [Donnelly ] conflicts with Vaca v. Sipes, [it] must yield in favor of the latter’s declaration of the applicable law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.