Skip to main content

Ryder v. State

Citations

  • 917 S.W.2d 503
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 898
  • 1996 WL 93799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because mother lacked standing
  • holding that because the mother's parental rights had been terminated and she had not appealed that decision, she had no standing to appeal the outcome of a placement review hearing
  • holding that because the mother's parental rights had been terminated and she had not appealed that decision, she had no standing to appeal the outcome of a placement review hearing
  • holding that appellate court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because mother lacked standing
  • holding appellate court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because mother lacked standing
  • parent lacked standing to challenge child’s placement where the termination of her parental rights became final after she failed to perfect an appeal from the termination decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings and Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.