Ryder Ex Rel. Ryder v. Warrior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a review of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in the context of a § 2254 petition are “doubly deferential in that [the court] take[s] a highly deferential look at counsel’s performance [under Strickland] through the deferential lens of § 2254(d)”
• holding that a review of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in the context of a § 2254 petition are “doubly deferential in that [the court] take[s] a highly deferential look at counsel’s performance [under Strickland] through the deferential lens of § 2254(d)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).