Skip to main content
· 12/29/1988

Rybak v. Dressler

Citations

  • 532 N.E.2d 1375
  • 178 Ill. App. 3d 569
  • 127 Ill. Dec. 366
  • 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 1817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the dismissal of a conversion claim where “defendants utterly failed to plead or prove an essential element of such a cause: a demand for possession of the funds allegedly converted by Rybak
  • under Illinois law, a postdated check is valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unverzagt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.