Ryan v. Tollefson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s revived memory of when he went to a basketball game and met a certain car thief, which was contrary to the testimony of the government’s rebuttal witness, was not newly discovered evidence so as to require a new trial
• concluding that the defendant's revived memory of when he went to a basketball game and met a certain car thief, which was contrary to the testimony of the government's rebuttal witness, was not newly discovered evidence so as to require a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).