Ryan v. Strong
Citations
- 111 Kan. 54
- 206 P. 322
- 1922 Kan. LEXIS 172
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Real-éstate Agent — Purchaser Found — Sale—Action jor Commissions — Verdict Contrary to Evidence. The controlling and conceded facts touching plaintiffs’ claim to a real-estate agent’s commission on the sale of property examined, and held, that a verdict for the defendant was contrary to the evidence and should have been set aside.</p> <p>2. Same. An issue of partnership raised in the first trial, and the significance given to the acts or services of an alleged partner to support plaintiffs’ claim to a real-estate dealer’s commission, considered, and the minimized significance to be given thereto in another trial discussed.</p>
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.