Ryan v. President of the Senate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he employer must demonstrate that there is a compelling need to maintain that practice, and the practice cannot be justified by routine business considerations” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• role-model rule forbidding employment of single pregnant women in Girls Club organization qualified as BFOQ
• per se intentional discrimination eliminates the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).