Ryan v. Dougherty
Citations
- 38 Cal. 676
Syllabus
<p>Forcible Entry and Detainer—Statute of 1866.—Forcible entry, within the meaning of the Act of 1866, may be committed by breaking the doors, etc., of a building, without any violence to the person in possession of the building.</p> <p>Idem.—The statute .seems to contemplate that a party may maintain an action for a forcible entry or a forcible detainer; and its purpose is to secure a speedy, if not a summary, restitution of the premises to the party deprived of the possession by the means therein specified.</p> <p>Idem—Demand and Refusal.—A demand for the surrender of the possession, upon the party detaining the same, and a refusal for the period of five days, are essential in order to constitute a constructive forcible detainer, as defined by the • third section of the Act.</p> <p>Idem.—A demand upon the party making the forcible entry, but who did not detain the premises, is ineffectual.</p>
Judges: Also, Crockett, Rhodes, Sawyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.