Ryan v. Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a 16-month period between an indefinite suspension and revocation of a security clearance was not “clearly excessive or unreasonable”
• noting that the petitioner did not show that the agency’s delay was “clearly excessive or unreasonable,” and observing that security clearance investigations “often take up to a year”
• noting that, in Douglas, the Board addressed the question of whether its statutory authority includes authority to modify or reduce a penalty imposed on an employee by an agency’s adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).