Skip to main content
· 3/28/2008

Ryan v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Citations

  • 885 N.E.2d 544
  • 381 Ill. App. 3d 877
  • 319 Ill. Dec. 273
  • 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, notwithstanding any defects in design, planning, supervision, observation, or management, a party still may be held liable for failure to maintain its equipment, so the statute of repose does not apply
  • holding that, notwithstanding any defects in design, planning, supervision, observation, or management, a party still may be held liable for failure to maintain its equipment, so the statute of repose does not apply
  • statute of repose does not apply where there is ongoing duty to maintain or inspect condition
  • describing holding of MBA Enters., 717 N.E.2d at 851

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.