Ryan v. Arneson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming punitive damage award of $18,600 in quite title action, even though actual damages were only $120
• comparing an actual award of $120 in a quiet title action to a punitive damage award of $18,600 and finding it was not excessive
• clarifying the first prong through an interpretation of Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.606(b
• clarifying the first prong through an interpretation of Iowa rule of evidence 606(b) by excluding any evidence of the internal deliberations of the jury but allowing statements containing extraneous prejudicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear on the jury
• clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence (5).606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejudicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury
• clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence (5).606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejudicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).