RYAN TIMOTHY BOYLAN-SOUTH v. JOHN F. TOLSON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal where the inclusion 24 1 of unidentified “doe” defendants “destroys [diversity] . . . jurisdiction”
• claim involving Doe 8 Defendants was properly dismissed for lack of diversity jurisdiction
• the Ninth Circuit concluded that the district court had properly dismissed a claim asserted against a named defendant and “several Doe defendants (none of whom has been identified or served)” because the inclusion of the Doe defendants destroyed diversity
• “Fraud claims normally 1 defendant refuses to litigate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).