Ryan, John Clement v. Reno, Janet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “under Egan an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”
• holding that “under Egan an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”
• holding that “under Egan an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”
• holding that “under Egan[,] an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”
• holding that security clearance decisions are non-reviewable under Title VII after Egan
• holding \an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).