Ryan Burns, by His Mother and Next Friend, Donna Burns v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the decision of whether to accord greater weight to contemporaneous medical records or later given testimony is “uniquely within the purview of the special master”
• concluding that it is within the special master's discretion to determine whether to afford greater weight to contemporaneous medical records than to other evidence
• holding that it is within the special master’s discretion to determine whether to afford greater weight to contemporaneous medical records than to other evidence
• concluding that it is within the special master's discretion to determine whether to afford greater weight to contemporaneous medical records than to other evidence
• holding that it is within the special master's discretion to determine whether to afford greater weight to contemporaneous medical records than to other evidence
• holding that “the special master did not err in accepting the contemporaneous medical records over the testimony of fact witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).