Ryals v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of benefits where employee quit job “primarily because he had procured employment elsewhere”
• “[W]here a claimant does not challenge the sufficiency of the [referee’s] findings, but only offers a different version of the facts, there is no legal error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).