Skip to main content
· 2/2/2011

Rx. Com, Inc. v. O'Quinn

Citations

  • 766 F. Supp. 2d 790
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11024
  • 2011 WL 338839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that federal antitrust law issues necessary to establish plaintiff’s malpractice claim may have been important to them, “but there was no broader issue of federal law implicated”
  • concluding no federal question in a malpractice case where underlying law was antitrust
  • applying the same logic as Gunn to a malpractice case where the underlying issue was federal law
  • malpractice based on underlying antitrust lawsuit under the Sherman Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray H. Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.