R.W. International Corp. v. Welch Food, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that Law 75 “insists upon establishment of a ‘supplier/dealer’ relationship”
• holding ___ that the broad definition of \dealer's contract\ in Law 75 would comprehend dealers actually engaging in product distribution for a principal, albeit only through a course of dealing preceding the execution of a final contract
• declaring that Law 75 \insists upon establishment of a 'supplier/dealer' relationship\
• discussing the narrow circumstances 14 in which a court will order a benefits calculation rather than further 15 proceedings
• rejecting request for further discovery despite conclusory allegations of antitrust injury where plaintiff distributors were in same position as defendant to ascertain effect of conduct at issue
• \Law 75 simply requires a supplier to justify its decision to terminate a dealership.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).