R.W. Beck, Inc. v. E3 Consulting, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the state common-law rights asserted by [the plaintiff’s unjust-enrichment claim] are equivalent to the exclusive rights set forth in § 106 of the Copyright Act”
• holding unjust enrichment claim preempted and noting that preemption applies where: “(1) the work is within the scope of the subject matter of copyright as specified under 17 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).