Ruzicka Electric and Sons, Inc. Thomas R. Ruzicka v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1, Afl-Cio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff had presented sufficient No. 11‐2290 Page 6 evidence of damages resulting from secondary boycott so that judgment as matter of law was not appropriate, and that jury should determine extent of damages on remand
• “If Local 1 engaged in secondary activity, then it violated federal labor law.”
• “If Local 1 engaged in secondary activity, then it violated federal labor law.”
• “Only when a labor organization intends ‘to enmesh neutral secondary employers in primary labor disputes between the union and another employer’ does it violate federal labor law.” (quoting NLRB v. Constr. & Gen. Laborers’ Union Local 1140, 577 F.2d 16, 18 (8th Cir. 1978))
• “Only when a labor organization intends ‘to enmesh neutral secondary employers in primary labor disputes between the union and another employer’ does it violate federal labor law.” (quoting NLRB v. Constr. & Gen. Laborers’ Union Local 1140, 577 F.2d 16, 18 (8th Cir. 1978))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).