Ruza v. Estate of Ruza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hen the trial court overlooks or fails to rule on an issue, the party seeking the court’s ruling must remind the court that it has not ruled and obtain a definitive ruling on the issue.”
• stating that a party “may not, at the post- trial motion stage, raise a new theory which was not raised during trial”
• stating that one “may not, at the post- trial motion stage, raise a new theory which was not raised during trial”
• finding issue based on coordinate jurisdiction rule to be waived where it was raised for the first time in post-trial motions
• one may not, at post-trial motion stage, raise new theory which was not raised during trial
• \a non-suit is properly entered if the plaintiff has not introduced sufficient evidence to establish the necessary elements to maintain a cause of action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).