Rux v. Republic of Sudan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a “final” order
• finding no basis for pendent jurisdiction given that \[e]ach issue involves a distinct legal concept that does not affect analysis of the other\
• upholding denial of motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in case involving the U.S.S. Cole bombing
• citing, inter alia, Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 42 (1995)
• \It [the proximate cause standard] serves simultaneously to weed out the most insubstantial cases without posing too high a hurdle to surmount at a threshold stage of the litigation.\
• \Plaintiffs must establish jurisdictional causation by alleging facts sufficient to establish a reasonable connection between a country's provision of material support to a terrorist organization and the damage arising out of a terrorist attack.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).