Rutyna v. Collection Accounts Terminal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant’s return address violated [the FDCPA], because its business name does indicate that it is in the debt collection business.”
• letter threatened to contact debtor's neighbors and employer unless payment was made immediately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).