Rutshaw v. Arakas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court’s order setting a trial on damages with just one-day notice was “insufficient as a matter of law” and curable on direct appeal
• “It is well settled that a 1.540 motion cannot be employed as a substitute for a timely appeal, much less for a timely preservation of error in the underlying action itself.”
• Cope, concurring in part, dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).