Rutland v. Crum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
• applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
• “The statute of limitations applicable to adverse possession claims does not apply to public lands, and, therefore, title to public property cannot be claimed on the basis of adverse possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).