Rutherford v. Katonah-Lewisboro School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity when they directed the plaintiff not to have communication with any other employee
• holding that “in order to state a viable First Amendment free association claim, Plaintiff must allege that the associational activity at issue touches upon a matter of public concern”
• holding that “in order to state a viable First Amendment free association claim, Plaintiff must allege that the associational activity at issue touches upon a matter of public concern”
• ruling “even if [defendant’s] decision was careless, or baseless, or even irrational, that is not enough to make out a violation of Plaintiffs constitutional right to privacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).