· 5/22/2009
Rutherford v. BNSF Railway Co.
Citations
- 2009 ND 88
- 765 N.W.2d 705
- 2009 N.D. LEXIS 94
- 2009 WL 1424440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a showing of both -7- provision is unconscionable is a question of law for the court.” Strand v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n ND, 693 N.W.2d 918, 921 (N.D. 2005
- requiring a showing of both -7- provision is unconscionable is a question of law for the court.” Strand v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n ND, 693 N.W.2d 918, 921 (N.D. 2005
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kapsner, Vande Walle, Maring, Sandstrom, Geiger, Crothers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.