Rutherford National Bank v. H. R. Bogle & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial court’s decision to admit video surveillance footage is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard
• explaining that “the trial court ultimately set aside Moore’s conviction on the charge of criminal gang activity . . . based on its finding that the evidence failed to show the requisite nexus between Moore’s crimes and furtherance of the gang’s interests”
• concluding, in light of strong evidence that defendant committed crimes charged, that it is highly probable the admission of a YouTube video showing the defendant displaying gang signs, even if the video lacked a proper 21 foundation, did not contribute to the jury’s verdict
• criminal street gang activity count set aside by trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).