Ruth Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 'The ALJ's selection of reasonable conflicting factual inferences is conclusive upon the Board if Supported by the evidence and not inconsistent with the law.'
• BRB holds that a guard/driver injured on a vessel was not engaged in employment with a realistically significant relationship to maritime activities-the court reverses, expressing amazement \how the BRB could fail to find Ms. Miller's employment as maritime\
• BRB holds that a guard/driver injured on a vessel was not engaged in employment with a realistically significant relationship to maritime activities — the court reverses, expressing amazement “how the BRB could fail to find Ms. Miller’s employment as maritime”
• courier/driver for maritime service agency is covered under Thibodaux test
• courier/driver for maritime service agency is covered under Thibodaux test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).