Skip to main content
· 10/1/1991

Ruth Leshore, Etc. v. County of Worcester

Citations

  • 945 F.2d 471
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 454
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22972
  • 1991 WL 192264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding vacation of default where defendant’s attorney’s illness caused failure to respond
  • answer filed about nine months after default, motion to set aside default filed about four months after default was entered
  • district court did not abuse its discretion when it accepted attorney’s illness as justification to set aside default
  • “Furthermore, although Rule 55(c) permits the removal of both an entry of default and a default judgment, the standard for the former at issue here, is more liberal.” (citing Coon, at 76)
  • “Furthermore, although Rule 55(c) permits the removal of both an entry of default and a default judgment, the standard for the former at issue here, is more liberal.” (citing Coon v. Grenier, 867 F.2d 73, 76 (1st Cir. 1989))
  • finding good cause when defendant was not given actual notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Cyr, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.