Ruth Frick Rice v. The President and Fellows of Harvard College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the dismissal of a claim against “the President and Fellows of Harvard College, which is a single corporate entity and, therefore, unable to conspire with itself in violation of § 1985(3)”
• stating that the district court should not have assessed standing under state law on pendant state claim but should have simply dismissed the state claim because \the federal claims [were] dismissed before trial\ (quoting United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966)
• “The fatal defect in this claim is that [plaintiff] has sued only the President and Fellows of Harvard College, which is a single corporate entity and, therefore, unable to conspire with itself in violation of [Section] 1985(3).”
• “The fatal defect in this claim is that [plaintiff] has sued 20 only the President and Fellows of Harvard College, which is a single corporate entity and, therefore, unable to conspire with itself in violation of [Section] 1985(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).