Rutar Farms & Livestock, Inc. v. Fuss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address permissive use after finding the appellant never made a prima facie showing its “casual use of the disputed lands was open, notorious, exclusive, [or] in a manner plainly indicating [it was] acting as owners [of the disputed lands].”
• declining to address permissive use after finding the appellant never made a prima facie showing its “casual use of the disputed lands was open, notorious, exclusive, [or] in a manner plainly indicating [it was] acting as owners [of the disputed lands].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).