Rutanhira v. Rutanhira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court committed reversible error when it conducted an internet search after the close of evidence and the information upon which it relied was unacceptable under the rules of judicial notice
• holding it was error for the district court to conduct its own investigation and rely on information taken from outside of the proceeding because it deprives the parties of the opportunity to respond and test any of the information acquired through this examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).