Rust v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying CMI’s pending motion to dismiss as moot because “Plaintiffs and CMI [already] stipulated to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiffs’ claims against CMI”
• dismissing an FDCPA claim because the plaintiffs had “not alleged that they were in default when [Defendant] began servicing the note [and] [a]ccordingly, [Defendant was] not a debt collector under the FDCPA”
• “Plaintiffs cannot amend their complaint by adding factual allegations in response to [a] motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).