· 8/28/1888
Russell v. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railway Co.
Citations
- 39 Minn. 145
- 39 N.W. 302
- 1888 Minn. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting a dynamic interpretation of \same as\ election statute given the legislature's intent to achieve \simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections\
- adopting a dynamic interpretation of “same as” election statute given the legislature’s intent to achieve “simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections”
- adopting a dynamic interpretation of “same as” election statute given the legislature’s intent to achieve “simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vanderburgh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.