Skip to main content
· 8/28/1888

Russell v. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 39 Minn. 145
  • 39 N.W. 302
  • 1888 Minn. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting a dynamic interpretation of \same as\ election statute given the legislature's intent to achieve \simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections\
  • adopting a dynamic interpretation of “same as” election statute given the legislature’s intent to achieve “simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections”
  • adopting a dynamic interpretation of “same as” election statute given the legislature’s intent to achieve “simplicity and uniformity in the conduct of elections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanderburgh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.