Russell v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements attributed to motorcycle seller that motorcycle was in “good shape” were statements of opinion and “sales talk, i.e., mere puffery, and [did] not rise to the level of a representation of material fact required to create an express warranty”
• “Whether a given representation is an expression of opinion or a statement of fact depends upon all the circumstances of the particular cases ... in cases of question should be left to the jury”
• likening mere sales talk to puffery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).