Russell v. Wells Fargo and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 778.114 “cannot be used to calculate overtime pay retroactively in a misclassification case”
• affording “respect” to part 778 under Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1994)
• \an effective clear mutual understanding is absent in misclassification cases\
• terming this sentence the “contemporaneous payment” requirement
• discussing Bailey, Clements, and Valerio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).