Russell v. University of Toledo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “finding that the plaintiff in that case was not similarly situated to co-workers who lacked prior disciplinary records”
• finding that failure to follow instructions and directions constitutes legitimate reason for discharge
• stating that failure to follow instructions and directions constitute legitimate reason for discharge
• stating that failure to follow instructions and directions constitute legitimate reason for discharge
• finding the plaintiff’s insubordination to be a non-discriminatory reason justifying her discharge
• finding the plaintiff could not show pretext where she had “a long history of complaints about [her] work performance and attitude, as well as multiple disciplinary actions” and her proposed comparators had no records of such discipline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).