Russell v. Thomas O'connor & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the context of a General Statutes § 52-593 motion, the applicable time period begins to run when notice is issued
• \the one year period in which to file a new action under § 52-593 begins when notice is issued that the original action has been terminated\
• court held that under General Statutes § 52-593 , the § 52-592 sister statute, the one year period begins when the notice is issued that the original action is terminated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Henriquez v. Allegre
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-19· cited 32×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-19· cited 157×
• Noethe v. Noethe
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-06-13· cited 38×
• Morelli v. Manpower, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-05-17· cited 29×
• Habura v. Kochanowicz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-12· cited 26×