Russell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was not procedurally barred because \[t]his Rule 32 petition was Russell's first opportunity to allege that [appellate counsel] was ineffective\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-06-29· cited 18×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-07-08· cited 15×
• Hinton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-04-28· cited 7×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-30· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brownlee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-01-13· cited 141×
• Ex Parte Ingram
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-02-23· cited 108×
• V.R. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-06-28· cited 16×
• Scroggins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
• Sunday v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-08-30· cited 8×