Russell v. Sheahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ORS 19.245 6 embodies “the fundamental principle that a party may not take an appeal from a judgment to which that party consented”
• construing former ORS 19.020 (1995), renumbered as ORS 19.245 (1997), which is substantively identical to the current version of ORS 19.245
• referring to the fact that there are at least 15 cases in Oregon that adhere to the waiver-of-appeal rule when a defendant consents explicitly or implicitly to the entry of judgment in the trial court
• tracing history of Oregon decisions denying appeals of stipulated judgments or consent decrees
• referring to the fact that there are at least 15 cases in Oregon that adhere to the waiver-of-appeal rule when a defendant consents explicitly or implicitly to the entry of judgment in the trial court
• “Consent to judgment terminates all controversy regarding the correctness of the court’s interlocutory legal rulings before judgment and regarding the adequacy of the relief to which the parties have agreed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).