Skip to main content

Russell v. Russell

Citations

  • 610 So. 2d 391
  • 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 235
  • 1992 WL 111650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Whether to reopen a case to allow additional evidence is a determination that also rests within the discretion of the trial court.\
  • \ Rule 59.1... provides that a post-judgment motion that is not ruled upon by the trial court within 90 days of filing is deemed denied. Failure to rule does not amount to an abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Russell, Thigpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.