Skip to main content
· 3/2/1891

Russell v. Post

Citations

  • 138 U.S. 425
  • 11 S. Ct. 353
  • 34 L. Ed. 1009
  • 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2097

Syllabus

<p>When, in the trial of a civil action charging a conspiracy to defraud, it appears in evidence that a loan, charged to have been an instrument in the conspiracy, was not an ordinary business transaction; that the compensation paid for it to the lender was so excessive as to be suspicious; that the purpose on the part of the borrower in taking the loan was the accomplishment of an act criminal in itself and made criminal by statute ; and when the surrounding circumstances proved in the case tend to charge the lender with knowledge of the wrongful purpose of the. borrower, the case should not be withdrawn from the jury, but it should be .submitted in order that they may determine whether the loan was made with .intent to consummate the wrong, and whether the lender knowingly assisted in accomplishing it.</p>

Judges: Brewer, Bradley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.