Russell v. Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “contract interpretation is left to the arbitrator”
• “[I]f the arbitrator interprets unambiguous language in any way different from its plain meaning, [the arbitrator] amends or alters the agreement and acts without authority.”
• “Although the arbitrator may interpret ambiguous language, the arbitrator may not disregard or modify unambiguous contract provisions.”
• “if the arbitrator interprets unambiguous language in any way different from its plain meaning, the arbitrator amends or alters the agreement and acts without authority”
• vacating award where arbitrator “ignored plain language of the contract”
• acknowledging “contract interpretation is left to the arbitrator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).