Skip to main content

Russell v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 456 P.2d 918
  • 104 Ariz. 548
  • 1969 Ariz. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The practice of affirming findings set aside by the granting of a hearing or rehearing is a source of procedural confusion and should not continue. The Commission in such cases has nothing to affirm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Udall, Lockwood, Struckmeyer, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.