Russell v. Hug

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts may rely on the infrastructure provided by state bar associations in meeting their own needs for monitoring attorney admission and practice in the federal courts
• “[The] Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . . . applies in terms only to actions taken by states, not to those . . . taken by the federal government.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).