Russell v. Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the school district was not aware of any gender-fluid students enrolled at the high school, and did not yet have a plan to consider how to accommodate them
• considered the same issue, agreeing with Students & Parents , and concluding that the plaintiffs failed to make the threshold showing that they suffered discrimination on the basis of sex
• finding being transgender is not a medical or psychiatric condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).