Russell v. GAF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a duty to warn exists when the evidence shows that the defendant “knew or should have known of a danger sufficiently serious to require a warning”
• noting “[o]f course, there must be a danger to warn about.”
• under theories of negligence and strict liability, the manufacturer's duty to provide warnings \is the same: ordinary care\
• discussing adequacy of warning given to an intermediary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).