· 2/28/1962
Russell v. Dobbs
Citations
- 354 S.W.2d 373
- 163 Tex. 282
- 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 286
- 1962 Tex. LEXIS 723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claimant’s debt was “extinguished” because claimant failed to bring suit within ninety days of rejection of claim by operation of law
- holding that claimant's debt was \extinguished\ because claimant failed to bring suit within ninety days of rejection of claim by operation of law
- stating that the statutes contemplate that a creditor will keep himself informed as to the status of his claim and take the steps required by law to reduce the same to judgment
- stating that the statutes contemplate that a creditor will keep himself informed as to the status of his claim and take the steps required by law to reduce the same to judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.