Skip to main content
· 2/28/1962

Russell v. Dobbs

Citations

  • 354 S.W.2d 373
  • 163 Tex. 282
  • 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 286
  • 1962 Tex. LEXIS 723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claimant’s debt was “extinguished” because claimant failed to bring suit within ninety days of rejection of claim by operation of law
  • holding that claimant's debt was \extinguished\ because claimant failed to bring suit within ninety days of rejection of claim by operation of law
  • stating that the statutes contemplate that a creditor will keep himself informed as to the status of his claim and take the steps required by law to reduce the same to judgment
  • stating that the statutes contemplate that a creditor will keep himself informed as to the status of his claim and take the steps required by law to reduce the same to judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.