Russell v. Buckles-Gale Intervening

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for trademark infringement under federal or North Carolina law where plaintiff failed to allege facts that would show how its purported mark has secondary meaning
• noting that “plaintiffs ‘emphatically disagree’ with the idea that ‘Old South’ and ‘Old South Apparel’[the latter being the term plaintiffs had registered] are two different terms, without explaining how that could be the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).