Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/5/2016

Russell Kiser v. Harry Kamdar

Citations

  • 831 F.3d 784
  • 2016 FED App. 0186P
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14394
  • 2016 WL 4150918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the challenged procedure did not cause the plaintiff’s alleged injury because another source caused the alleged injury
  • applying the Central Hudson test to a content- and speaker-based restriction on advertising imposed by the Ohio State Dental Board
  • applying Graham and Albright to conclude that the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process protection was not the appropriate source for a First Amendment free- speech claim
  • declining to consider the plaintiff’s substantive-due-process challenge because it was really a commercial-speech case
  • finding substantive-due-process claim necessarily was a claim for a First Amendment violation
  • treating a Eubank claim as sounding in procedural due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Kethledge, Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.