Sixth Circuit· 8/5/2016
Russell Kiser v. Harry Kamdar
Citations
- 831 F.3d 784
- 2016 FED App. 0186P
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14394
- 2016 WL 4150918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the challenged procedure did not cause the plaintiff’s alleged injury because another source caused the alleged injury
- applying the Central Hudson test to a content- and speaker-based restriction on advertising imposed by the Ohio State Dental Board
- applying Graham and Albright to conclude that the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process protection was not the appropriate source for a First Amendment free- speech claim
- declining to consider the plaintiff’s substantive-due-process challenge because it was really a commercial-speech case
- finding substantive-due-process claim necessarily was a claim for a First Amendment violation
- treating a Eubank claim as sounding in procedural due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs, Kethledge, Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Okla. v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2023-03-03· cited 19×
- Andrew Rice v. Village of Johnstown, OhioSixth Circuit· 2022-04-08· cited 16×
- Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth HertelSixth Circuit· 2021-08-23· cited 7×
- First Choice Chiropractic, LLC v. Mike DeWineSixth Circuit· 2020-08-13· cited 4×
- Seum v. OsborneE.D. Kentucky· 2018-09-28· cited 4×
- Nat'l Inst. of Fam. & Life Advocs. v. JamesSecond Circuit· 2025-12-01
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 7,028×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 1,218×
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,096×
- Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 707×
- Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 677×
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandSixth Circuit· 2007-09-25· cited 486×
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court· 1977-05-02· cited 471×
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court· 1928-11-19· cited 398×
- Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co.Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 332×
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court· 1912-12-02· cited 316×
- Russell Kiser v. Lili ReitzSixth Circuit· 2014-08-27· cited 91×
- Pagan v. FrucheySixth Circuit· 2007-06-29· cited 47×
- Stanley N. Parker, D.M.D. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Board of DentistrySixth Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 37×
- Chambers v. StengelSixth Circuit· 2001-07-09· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.